Twenty three people filled in your form in the first twenty days of September. August finished at thirty two, your best month yet, and September is running a little ahead of that pace.
Everything below was pulled fresh on September 20, straight from Google, your site, your profile, and the AI platforms. September is a partial month everywhere it appears on this page, twenty days of thirty, and it is labeled that way every time.
One honest note before the numbers. Form fills and calls that start on your website are counted on the site itself. What is not in here is which of them turned into a booked event, so read these as inquiries, not as signed contracts.
| Month | Form fills | Clicks from Google | The month's work |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mayfrom the 21st, 11 days | 6 | 67 | Engagement started May 21. Site audit and Google Business Profile baseline captured |
| June | 17 | 156 | Citations submitted to 5 networks on June 8: Data Axle, Foursquare, GPS Network, Neustar, YP Network |
| July | 15 -12% vs Jun | 192 +23% vs Jun | Crawl expanded from 101 pages to the full 215 page site, surfacing the deeper fix queue |
| August | 32 +113% vs Jul | 205 +7% vs Jul | Fix deployment continued: 956 fixes live, crawl widened to the full 251 page site |
| September so far20 days in, not yet a full month | 23 | 123 | Average search position reached 9.1, the best of the engagement |
The Ledger
Month by month, what we did and what moved. Same months, same sources, side by side.
Google Business
Pulled from your Google Business Profile for each closed month, plus August so far. Google's own counts, not ours.
Search
Google Search Console, pulled twice and cross-checked against Search Atlas before anything rendered.
Branded vs Non Branded
Every query Google named in the window, sorted into people who already knew your name and people who did not.
AI Visibility
Tracked across ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Perplexity and Copilot over the full ninety days.
Attribution
We count only what we can see today: your Google profile and your search results.
Keywords
54 tracked search terms, positions pulled June 15 through August 14.
Map Pack
Rank measured at 39 separate points on a 3 mile map around your location, checked August 1.
Technical Work
Site audit and fix log pulled live from the optimization engine running on your site.
Search brought 329 clicks to your site over July and the first 24 days of August, and your profile was seen 1,159 times in the same stretch.
Ninety days in, this is the whole picture in one place: what people searched, what Google showed them, and what they did next.Every month, on the record.
Four full months and a partial one, side by side.
Search clicks went 67 in May, 156 in June, 192 in July, 205 in August. August is the strongest closed month of the engagement. September sits at 123 through the twentieth, which is a shade under August's daily pace with ten days still to run.
May was setup. June was the foundation: citations out to five networks, your profile brought current, the first wave of on page fixes live. July is when the site started earning traffic on its own. August held that and added to it.
Here is the part of September worth your attention. Clicks are flat against August, but your average position improved to 9.1, the best of the whole engagement. You are being shown higher up the page for the same work. That usually turns into clicks a month or two behind the ranking.
| Month | What we did | What it produced |
|---|---|---|
| May so far11 days in, not yet a full month | Engagement started May 21. Site audit and Google Business Profile baseline captured · Technical foundation started: on-page fixes queued across the site · Keyword tracking and AI visibility tracking stood up from scratch | 6 reached the form11 started · 5 calls |
| June | Citations submitted to 5 networks on June 8: Data Axle, Foursquare, GPS Network, Neustar, YP Network · Google Business Profile optimized: services, attributes and categories brought current · On-page fix deployment ran through the site, first measurable search lift landed | 17 reached the form38 started · 5 calls |
| July | Crawl expanded from 101 pages to the full 215 page site, surfacing the deeper fix queue · Map pack tracking widened to 51 keyword grids across Chicagoland · Search clicks reached 192 for the month, the strongest closed month so far | 15 reached the form38 started · 17 calls |
| August | Fix deployment continued: 956 fixes live, crawl widened to the full 251 page site · Form fills closed the month at 32, the best month of the engagement · Ninety day review: full re-pull of every source for this report | 32 reached the form54 started · 20 calls |
| September so far20 days in, not yet a full month | Average search position reached 9.1, the best of the engagement · Fourth map pack check taken September 1 across all 51 keyword grids · Wedding lighting chicago held a top three spot at all 39 map points | 23 reached the form42 started · 4 calls |
| Total | 93 reached the form183 started · 51 calls |
Form starts and form fills are counted on your own site. "Calls" here are calls that began on the website, which is a different number from the call button on your Google profile.
The first two months built the foundation. The last two are when the search numbers started climbing on their own.
The work compounds. This is where you see it stack rather than spike.Your Google front door, measured.
Your Google listing was viewed 599 times in July and 818 times in August. August was the best month your profile has had.
Profile actions are calls plus website clicks plus direction requests. They went 115 in June, 98 in July, then 154 in August. That is 57 percent more than July.
September is the honest part. Through the twentieth you are at 68 profile actions, 386 views, and 42 people asking Google for directions to you. At the same point in August you were near 100 actions. September is running at about 3.4 actions a day against August's 5. Some of that is the calendar. Some of it is not, and we are watching it instead of explaining it away.
Your profile has posted on nearly every day since June 2, and posting has not stopped. Posting is what keeps a profile active in Google's eyes.
You now have 29 reviews at a 4.83 average. 28 of the 29 have a reply. One is still waiting on one.
One note on the call button. 19 people tapped it across the first four months and 5 more in September. That is not something to fix. People planning a wedding or a gala send a message, they do not ring a number off a phone screen, and your form numbers say exactly that.
September so far (first 20 days): 5 calls, 386 profile views. Full month lands in your next check-in.
These are only the taps Google counted on the profile itself. Somebody who found you on Google, opened the site and filled in the form there is counted in the website numbers, not in these.
Your profile was viewed 599 times in July and 426 more in the first three weeks of August. Directions requests are the strongest signal here, 57 in July and 62 in August so far.
This is your map listing: how often it was seen, and what people did when they saw it.The searches that find you.
205 clicks in August from 12,409 times Google put your business in front of somebody. Both are the highest of the engagement. In September you are at 123 clicks from 7,394 with ten days left.
The number that moved most is the one nobody looks at. Your average position is 9.1 in September, against 10.9 in August and 11.6 back in May. Google is placing you nearly three spots higher than it did in May.
Your own name is still doing heavy lifting. elegant event lighting brought 216 clicks on its own. When people know to look for you, they find you and they click.
The gap is everything else. event lighting chicago was put in front of people 236 times and earned 4 clicks. elegant lighting was shown 700 times and earned 3.
| What they searched | Clicks | Times shown | Avg spot |
|---|---|---|---|
| elegant event lighting | 216 | 476 | 5.3 |
| elegant event lighting chicago | 12 | 25 | 1.0 |
| event lighting rental | 7 | 60 | 14.7 |
| chandelier rentals for weddings | 6 | 21 | 4.3 |
| elegant events | 5 | 72 | 3.0 |
| eel chicago | 5 | 38 | 3.7 |
| event lighting chicago | 4 | 236 | 9.3 |
| elegant lighting | 3 | 700 | 4.0 |
| lighting rental chicago | 3 | 75 | 7.1 |
| What they searched | Times shown | Avg spot |
|---|---|---|
| schaumburg outdoor lighting | 602 | 3.3 |
| wedding lighting | 456 | 7.2 |
| hoffman estates outdoor lighting | 453 | 8.5 |
| best wedding lighting ideas | 317 | 4.9 |
| which lighting systems are recommended for corporate events? | 162 | 6.0 |
| what are the best ideas for romantic wedding lighting? | 160 | 7.1 |
192 clicks in July from 10,274 times Google put you in front of someone. August is running at 119 clicks from 7,700 with ten days still to go.
What people typed, how often Google showed you, and how often they clicked.Beyond your name, new demand.
This is the most useful page in the report, so read it slowly.
Google showed you 1,564 times to people searching your name. They clicked 240 times. That is better than one in seven, which is excellent.
Google showed you 14,118 times to people who did not know your name. They clicked 47 times. That is one in 300.
91 percent of the times Google put you in front of somebody, it was in front of a stranger, and strangers are not clicking. Your reputation works. Your listings in search results are not yet doing the same job for people meeting you for the first time.
And the share is going the wrong way, so it needs saying plainly. In the first thirty days, 21 percent of your clicks came from people who did not know your name. In the last thirty it was 10 percent. You are growing, and almost all of the growth is people who already knew to look for you.
That is a page problem, not a ranking problem. You are already on the page.
| Search | Times Google showed you | Where you rank |
|---|---|---|
| corporate event lighting | 886 | 11.0 |
| event lighting | 802 | 3.9 |
| outdoor wedding ideas | 643 | 13.5 |
| schaumburg outdoor lighting | 602 | 3.3 |
| wedding decoration ideas | 515 | 13.4 |
| wedding lighting | 456 | 7.2 |
| hoffman estates outdoor lighting | 453 | 8.5 |
| best wedding lighting ideas | 317 | 4.9 |
| wedding rentals in chicago | 307 | 37.3 |
| event lighting chicago | 236 | 9.3 |
| event lighting ideas | 217 | 11.0 |
| wedding decorations ideas | 188 | 13.2 |
| Search | Visits from Google | Times shown | Where you rank | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| event lighting rental | 7 | 60 | 14.7 | Holding |
| chandelier rentals for weddings | 6 | 21 | 4.3 | Holding |
| elegant events | 5 | 72 | 3.0 | Holding |
| event lighting chicago | 4 | 236 | 9.3 | Holding |
| lighting rental chicago | 3 | 75 | 7.1 | Holding |
| event lighting | 2 | 802 | 3.9 | Holding |
| chandelier rental | 1 | 12 | 5.8 | Holding |
| chandelier rental wedding | 1 | 5 | 29.0 | Holding |
| chicago lighting rental | 1 | 128 | 10.1 | Holding |
| corporate event lighting | 1 | 886 | 11.0 | Holding |
| elegant lighitng | 1 | 12 | 3.3 | Holding |
| event decor rental chicago | 1 | 20 | 46.9 | Holding |
| event elegance rentals | 1 | 6 | 2.7 | Holding |
| event lights rental | 1 | 5 | 1.8 | Holding |
| intelligent lighting wedding | 1 | 13 | 9.8 | Holding |
| lighting for wedding reception | 1 | 126 | 8.9 | Holding |
| party lighting rental | 1 | 15 | 3.3 | Holding |
| professional event lighting | 1 | 9 | 4.4 | Holding |
| rental chandeliers | 1 | 7 | 1.6 | Holding |
| stage rental | 1 | 6 | 1.0 | Holding |
| warm amber uplighting | 1 | 16 | 3.6 | Holding |
| wedding chandelier rental | 1 | 13 | 12.4 | Holding |
| wedding draping chicago | 1 | 15 | 41.9 | Holding |
| wedding lighting chicago | 1 | 42 | 30.4 | Holding |
| wedding lights | 1 | 10 | 3.7 | Holding |
| wedding uplighting | 1 | 6 | 5.2 | Holding |
About 9 in 10 of the searches you turn up for are people looking for the work, not for you by name. That is 1,259 different searches in this window, and it is climbing: 90.1% of your first month, 91% of the last. The demand is real and Google is already showing you for it. What it is not doing yet is placing you high enough to earn the click, and that is exactly what more pages fixes.
Branded searches mean your reputation is working. Non branded searches mean you are being found by strangers, which is the harder half.Where AI recommends you.
When somebody asks ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot, or Google's own AI answers who handles event lighting in Chicago, you now come up in 56.9 percent of the tracked questions.
Before we started, over March and April, that number was 27.8 percent. You have roughly doubled it.
The tone matters as much as the count. Sentiment sits at 75 out of 100, which means when an assistant describes your company it describes it well, not just accurately.
September needs a flag. This number peaked at 72 in the last week of August and has sat between 54 and 56 through September. It is still double where you started and it is the single most volatile number on this page, because it moves whenever the AI platforms change how they answer. One month down is not a trend. Two would be, so it is on the watch list.
Google AI Mode is the one to watch. It is the AI layer inside Google search itself, so it reaches people who never open ChatGPT at all.
| What people ask | How often you show up | Spot when shown |
|---|---|---|
| Elegant Event Lighting pricing | 100% | #1 |
| Elegant Event Lighting review | 100% | #1 |
| Elegant Event Lighting uplighting review | 100% | #1 |
| Elegant Event Lighting pricing Chicago | 98% | #1 |
| Best luxury wedding lighting packages in Chicago that include draping, backdrops, and monograms | 94% | #1 |
| Where can I hire chandelier rental Chicago with a turnkey wedding lighting package and in-house production team | 84% | #2 |
| Elegant Event Lighting LED floor pricing | 83% | #1 |
| Where can I find stage lighting installation designers who handle full design, rental, and on-site setup for Chicago weddings? | 76% | #2 |
| How does a chandelier rental Chicago service compare in terms of design, installation, and inventory | 61% | #2 |
| Where can I rent uplighting and pinspots for a Chicago wedding with in-house design and production? | 52% | #2 |
| How do I choose stage lighting installation services for a design-led wedding in the Chicago area? | 47% | #3 |
| LED dance floor rental with premium backdrops and draping near Chicago | 41% | #2 |
| What are the best uplighting and pinspots for a high-end Chicago wedding with chandeliers? | 39% | #3 |
| best LED dance floor rental for weddings in Chicago with decor and design services | 35% | #2 |
| What should I look for in end-to-end wedding lighting design with in-house production in Chicago | 34% | #3 |
| AI channel | Does it name you | Times it quoted your site | Share of sources | Your place as a source | Who is ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini | Yes, 67% of answers | 221 | 18% | #2 most quoted | gstatic.com ahead of you at 230 |
| Perplexity | Yes, 41% of answers | 215 | 12% | Most quoted source | |
| Google AI Mode | Yes, 66% of answers | 194 | 12% | Most quoted source | |
| Copilot | Yes, 52% of answers | 141 | 15% | Most quoted source | |
| ChatGPT | Yes, 57% of answers | 126 | 7% | #2 most quoted | weddingwire.com ahead of you at 149 |
| Page on your site | Times quoted | Share of your citations |
|---|---|---|
| / | 322 | 36% |
| /faq/ | 117 | 13% |
| /testimonials/ | 58 | 6% |
| /contact-us/ | 51 | 6% |
| /services/ | 51 | 6% |
| /gallery/ | 40 | 4% |
| /blog/best-chandelier-rental-options-for-stunning-weddings/ | 26 | 3% |
| /request-proposal/ | 18 | 2% |
| /blog/understanding-pricing-for-elegant-event-lighting-services/ | 16 | 2% |
| /blog/discover-our-event-lighting-rental-pricing-whats-inside/ | 16 | 2% |
Google AI Mode is the AI layer inside Google search itself, so it reaches people who never open ChatGPT. A sentiment score of 75 means that when an assistant describes your company, it describes it positively far more often than not.
You come up in 56.9 percent of the tracked questions, and when you do, the tone is positive far more often than not.
When somebody asks an AI assistant who lights events in Chicago, this is how often your name comes back.Counted, not guessed.
One honest note about what these numbers do and do not include.
Here is what we can count. 144 people have reached out since May 21. 93 filled in a form. 51 called from the website. That splits 11 in May from the 21st, 22 in June, 32 in July, 52 in August, and 27 in the first twenty days of September.
183 people started filling in the form and 93 finished it. That is roughly one in two. The half who stop partway are the cheapest inquiries you will ever get, because Google has already done its job and sent them.
One thing in September points two ways at once. Form fills are up and running ahead of August. Calls that started on the website are down hard, 4 so far against 20 in August. We are not going to dress that up as a preference for forms until October says the same thing. For now it is one number moving that we cannot yet explain.
One caution on the counting. Google Analytics has two ways of tallying these and they disagree. Counting the form fills and calls themselves covers the whole engagement and gives you 144. Google's own tally of them was only switched on August 11, so it gives you 70. Both are real. Only one of them answers the question you are asking, and we used that one.
What we cannot see is which of those 144 became a booked event. That happens on your side, after the message arrives. When we can see which inquiries book, every number on this page can be read in events won instead of messages received.
So read these as inquiries, not as signed contracts.
The one thing we still cannot see: which inquiries became booked events.
We can count the inquiry. What we cannot see is which of those inquiries turned into a booked event, because that happens on your side after the form arrives. Once we can see which inquiries book, every number on this page can be read in events won rather than in contacts made.
We would rather show you a smaller true number than a bigger guess.
We would rather show you a smaller true number than a bigger guess.
Two systems count different things and we never add them together.Your keywords, on the clock.
Of the 54 search terms we track, 20 now sit in the top three and 25 are on page one. At the sixty day mark that was 18 and 24.
The average position across everything tracked is 1 for the terms we rank on.
event lighting rental and event lighting design both sit at number one. That is the shape of what works: when the search is specific and you have a page that matches it, you win it outright.
| Search term | Avg spot | Movement (May 21 to September 20, 2026) |
|---|---|---|
| event lighting rental | 1.0 | New this period |
| event lighting design | 1.0 | New this period |
| wedding chandeliers rentals | 1.0 | Holding |
| wedding lighting hire | 1.0 | Holding |
| lighting rentals for events | 1.0 | Holding |
The tracker compares where terms started against where they sit today. From next month, this section carries a month by month line for every term that ranks.
18 of your 54 tracked terms now sit at number one, and 24 are on page one. At the sixty day mark that was 14 and 19.
Where you sit on the page for the searches that matter to your business.Your map pack, pin by pin.
Map rank is not one number. We measure it at 39 separate points on a three mile map around you, because you can own a search on one block and be invisible four miles away.
There are now four checks to compare: June 8, July 1, August 1, and September 1. Each map below shows the first check beside the most recent one, so you can see which way it moved.
On event lighting chicago you hold a top three spot at all 39 points. Average position 1.1. You have held all 39 at every one of the four checks. There is nothing above this.
On wedding lighting chicago you went from 38 of the 39 points in June to all 39 now, and the average improved from 1.7 in August to 1.5 in September. That one is moving the right way.
On dance floor rental chicago you hold a top three spot at 3 of 39. You picked one point back since August, but the average slipped again, from 5.5 to 5.8. It was 4.2 in July. Four checks in, this is a slide, not a wobble.
Same company. Same crews. Same service area. On lighting you own the map and you have held it for four straight checks. On dance floors most of the map cannot see you, and three of the four checks have moved the wrong way.
On event lighting chicago you hold a top three spot at all 39 points on the map, averaging 1.1, and you have held all 39 since June. On wedding lighting chicago you went from 38 of 39 points up to all 39. On dance floor rental chicago you are top three at 2 of 39 and average 5.5, down from 4 points in June. Lighting is won. Dance floors are going the wrong way.
Top three at all 39 points in June and still all 39 in August. This one has held the whole quarter. Each pin is a real spot in town. The number is where you rank when someone searches from there. The ring marks your location.
38 of the 39 points in June, all 39 now. The average spot moved from 1.3 to 1.7, which is the difference between first and second place on a handful of pins. The coverage got wider, not thinner. Each pin is a real spot in town. The number is where you rank when someone searches from there. The ring marks your location.
This is the one moving the wrong way. Top three at 4 points in June and 2 now. It improved in July to an average of 4.2, then gave it back. Lighting is carrying this profile and dance floors are not riding along with it. Each pin is a real spot in town. The number is where you rank when someone searches from there. The ring marks your location.
On event lighting chicago you are in the top three at all 39 points on the map. On dance floor rental chicago you are top three at 2 of 39.
Map rank is not one number. You can own a search downtown and be invisible six miles out.The foundation under all of it.
956 fixes are deployed and live, and the crawl now covers 251 pages.
The audit score reads 84, back to where it was in June. That is worth a sentence, because it dipped to 82 in August for a reason that was never a problem: the crawler kept finding more of your site. It looked at 101 pages in June, 215 in August, and 251 now. A bigger site with the same standards scores lower until the new pages get worked through. They have been.
The fixes are the number that matters, and they are live.
The work, month by month
- June: Citations submitted to 5 networks, 40 to 45 day propagation window opened · Google Business Profile services and attributes pushed live
- July: Site crawl expanded from 101 to 215 pages · Map pack grid coverage widened to 51 tracked keywords
- August: Fix queue worked down to 875 deployed fixes across the full site · Ninety day source re-pull and reconciliation
- September: Crawl expanded from 215 to 251 pages; fix queue deployed to 956 of 1,173 found · Audit score recovered to 84 on the widened crawl
875 fixes are deployed and live across 215 pages. The page count more than doubled since June, which is why the score reads 82 rather than higher.
The groundwork that decides whether Google and AI can read your pages and trust them.Three doors, all honest.
Three things, and every one comes straight off a number above.
First, the dance floor page. You are top three at 3 of 39 map points on dance floor rental chicago and 39 of 39 on lighting, and the dance floor average has slipped at three of the four checks. Google has plenty on your site that says lighting and almost nothing that says dance floors. LED floors, wood rings, the sizes you actually stock, on their own page, with the service area named.
Second, the click gap, and it is now the biggest thing on this page. 14,118 times Google showed you to somebody who did not know your name, and 47 of them clicked. Worse, that share has fallen from 21 percent of your clicks to 10 percent. Start with event lighting chicago, where 236 people saw you at position 9.3 and 4 clicked. You are already on the page. The line they read is what is losing them.
Third, the September watch. Your profile actions are running slower than August and your AI visibility came off its peak. Neither is alarming on its own at twenty days. Both get checked again at the end of the month before anybody changes plan.
More inquiries is what you buy. Fewer nights chasing the ones you missed is what you get.
Build the dance floor rental page the map is asking for
This is the sharpest number in the report. On event lighting chicago and wedding lighting chicago you hold a top three map spot at all 39 points measured. On dance floor rental chicago you hold it at 2 of 39, averaging spot 5.5. It is the same company, the same crews and the same service area, so this is not a delivery problem. It is that Google has nothing on your site that says dance floors the way it has something that says lighting. LED floors, wood rings and the sizes you actually stock, on their own page, with the service area named.
Why: Map Pack shows 39 of 39 on lighting and 2 of 39 on dance floors.Turn the corporate event lighting demand into clicks
Google showed you for corporate event lighting 572 times in the window and almost nobody clicked. That is not a ranking problem, it is a page problem: what a corporate planner sees when they land does not answer what a corporate planner asked. Event lighting itself was shown 620 times with the same result. Two of your three largest pools of demand are being seen and passed over.
Why: Search shows 10,274 impressions in July against 192 clicks.
Turn visible into chosen on the dance floor map
Once the dance floor page is live the map has something to rank. The grid says you are closer than the average spot suggests: of the 39 points measured on dance floor rental chicago, 35 sit in spots 4 to 7. That is visible but below the three Google actually shows. Photos of real floors at real venues, the service area named on the page, and the review flow pointed at dance floor jobs are what move a point from spot 5 to spot 3.
Why: Map Pack shows 35 of 39 points in spots 4 to 7 on dance floor rental chicago.
Ninety days in, the lighting half of your market is won on the map and the dance floor half is not. That is a good problem, because it is a build, not a rescue.
One whole revenue line is invisible on the map and one is already won. That is the shape of the next ninety days.
What we are doing next and why that and not something else.The data behind every number.
Every number on this page came from one of these, on the date shown. If a source could not be reached, the section says so rather than showing a zero.
| Source | Read on | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Google Business Profile | 2026-09-20 | Pulled live |
| Google Search Console | 2026-09-20 | Pulled live |
| Search trend checkpoints (GSC) | 2026-09-20 | Pulled live |
| Google Search Console, checked twice (direct Google pull) | 2026-09-20 | Verified twice |
| Branded vs non-branded split (Google Search Console) | 2026-09-20 | Pulled live |
| Organic visits (Google Analytics) | 2026-09-20 | Pulled live |
| Search Console total, second read (Search Atlas) | 2026-09-20 | Pulled live |
| OTTO site work log | 2026-09-20 | Pulled live |
| AI visibility check | 2026-09-20 | Pulled live |
| AI visibility trend | 2026-09-20 | Pulled live |
| AI visibility baseline | 2026-08-21 | Pulled live |
| AI questions tracked | 2026-09-20 | Pulled live |
| AI citations by channel | 2026-09-20 | Pulled live |
| Rank tracker | 2026-09-20 | Pulled live |
| Local map pack | 2026-09-20 | Pulled live |
| Map pack pins (39 points per term) | 2026-09-20 | Pulled live |
If a source could not be reached, it says so rather than showing a zero.
You can check any number here yourself.